AF-SOOMAALI

The se­cret his­tory of US navy’s SEAL Team 6


They have plot­ted deadly mis­sions from se­cret bases in the bad­lands of So­ma­lia. In Afghanistan, they have en­gaged in com­bat so in­ti­mate that they have emerged soaked in blood that was not their own. On clan­des­tine raids in the dead of the night, their weapons of choice have ranged from cus­tomized car­bines to primeval tom­a­hawks.

Around the world, they have run spy­ing sta­tions dis­guised as com­mer­cial boats, posed as civil­ian em­ploy­ees of front com­pa­nies and op­er­ated un­der­cover at em­bassies as male-fe­male pairs, track­ing those the United States wants to kill or cap­ture.

Those op­er­a­tions are part of the hid­den his­tory of the US navy’s SEAL Team 6, one of the nation’s most mythologized, most secretive and least scrutinized military organizations. Once a small group re­served for spe­cial­ized but rare mis­sions, the unit best known for killing Osama bin Laden has been trans­formed by more than a decade of com­bat into a global man­hunt­ing ma­chine.

That role re­flects Amer­i­ca’s new way of war, in which con­flict is dis­tin­guished not by bat­tle­field wins and losses, but by the re­lent­less killing of sus­pected mil­i­tants.

Al­most every­thing about SEAL Team 6, a clas­si­fied spe­cial op­er­a­tions unit, is shrouded in se­crecy — the Pen­ta­gon does not even pub­licly ac­knowl­edge that name — though some of its ex­ploits have emerged in largely ad­mir­ing ac­counts in re­cent years. But an ex­am­i­na­tion of Team 6’s evo­lu­tion, drawn from dozens of in­ter­views with cur­rent and for­mer team mem­bers, other mil­i­tary of­fi­cials and re­views of gov­ern­ment doc­u­ments, re­veals a far more com­plex, provoca­tive tale.

While fight­ing grind­ing wars of at­tri­tion in Afghanistan and Iraq, Team 6 per­formed mis­sions else­where that blurred the tra­di­tional lines be­tween sol­dier and spy. The team’s sniper unit was re­made to carry out clan­des­tine in­tel­li­gence op­er­a­tions, and the SEALs joined CIA op­er­a­tives in an ini­tia­tive called the Omega Pro­gram, which of­fered greater lat­i­tude in hunt­ing ad­ver­saries.

Team 6 has suc­cess­fully car­ried out thou­sands of dan­ger­ous raids that mil­i­tary lead­ers credit with weak­en­ing mil­i­tant net­works, but its ac­tiv­i­ties have also spurred re­cur­ring con­cerns about ex­ces­sive killing and civil­ian deaths.

Afghan vil­lagers and a British com­man­der ac­cused SEALs of in­dis­crim­i­nately killing men in one ham­let; in 2009, team mem­bers joined CIA and Afghan para­mil­i­tary forces in a raid that left a group of youths dead and in­flamed ten­sions be­tween Afghan and Nato of­fi­cials. Even a US hostage freed in a dra­matic res­cue has ques­tioned why the SEALs killed all his cap­tors.

When sus­pi­cions have been raised about mis­con­duct, out­side over­sight has been lim­ited. Joint Spe­cial Op­er­a­tions Com­mand, which over­sees SEAL Team 6 mis­sions, con­ducted its own in­quiries into more than a half-dozen episodes, but sel­dom re­ferred them to navy in­ves­ti­ga­tors. “JSOC in­ves­ti­gates JSOC, and that’s part of the prob­lem,” said one for­mer se­nior mil­i­tary of­fi­cer ex­pe­ri­enced in spe­cial op­er­a­tions, who like many oth­ers in­ter­viewed for this ar­ti­cle spoke on the con­di­tion of anonymity be­cause Team 6’s ac­tiv­i­ties are clas­si­fied.

Even the mil­i­tary’s civil­ian over­seers do not reg­u­larly ex­am­ine the unit’s op­er­a­tions. “This is an area where Con­gress no­to­ri­ously does­n’t want to know too much,” said Harold Koh, the State De­part­men­t’s for­mer top le­gal ad­viser, who pro­vided guid­ance to the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion on clan­des­tine war.

Waves of money have sluiced through SEAL Team 6 since 2001, al­low­ing it to sig­nif­i­cantly ex­pand its ranks — reach­ing roughly 300 as­sault troops, called op­er­a­tors, and 1,500 sup­port per­son­nel — to meet new de­mands. But some team mem­bers ques­tion whether the re­lent­less pace of op­er­a­tions has eroded the unit’s elite cul­ture and worn down Team 6 on com­bat mis­sions of lit­tle im­por­tance. The group was sent to Afghanistan to hunt al-Qaida lead­ers, but in­stead spent years con­duct­ing close-in bat­tle against mid- to low-level Tal­iban and other en­emy fight­ers. Team 6 mem­bers, one for­mer op­er­a­tor said, served as “util­ity in­field­ers with guns.”

The cost was high: More mem­bers of the unit have died over the past 14 years than in all its pre­vi­ous his­tory. Re­peated as­saults, para­chute jumps, rugged climbs and blasts from ex­plo­sives have left many bat­tered, phys­i­cally and men­tally.


A screen grab of a video pro­vided by the US de­fence de­part­ment shows Navy SEAL Team 6 op­er­a­tors help­ing re­trieve Pfc Jes­sica Lynch, who had been in­jured, cap­tured and held in a hos­pi­tal, dur­ing the early days of the Iraq war, in 2003. (Via NYT)

“War is not this pretty thing that the United States has come to be­lieve it to be,” said Britt Slabin­ski, a re­tired se­nior en­listed mem­ber of Team 6 and vet­eran of com­bat in Afghanistan and Iraq. “It’s emo­tional, one hu­man be­ing killing an­other hu­man be­ing for ex­tended pe­ri­ods of time. It’s go­ing to bring out the worst in you. It’s also go­ing to bring out the best in you.”
Team 6 and its army coun­ter­part, Delta Force, have de­liv­ered in­tre­pid per­for­mances that have drawn the na­tion’s two most re­cent pres­i­dents to de­ploy them to an ex­pand­ing list of far-off trou­ble spots. They in­clude Syria and Iraq, now un­der threat from the Is­lamic State, and Afghanistan, So­ma­lia and Yemen, mired in con­tin­u­ing chaos.

Like the CIA’s cam­paign of drone strikes, spe­cial op­er­a­tions mis­sions of­fer pol­i­cy­mak­ers an al­ter­na­tive to costly wars of oc­cu­pa­tion. But the bul­wark of se­crecy around Team 6 makes it im­pos­si­ble to fully as­sess its record and the con­se­quences of its ac­tions, in­clud­ing civil­ian ca­su­al­ties or the deep re­sent­ment in­side the coun­tries where its mem­bers op­er­ate. The mis­sions have be­come em­bed­ded in US com­bat with lit­tle pub­lic dis­cus­sion or de­bate.

For­mer sen­a­tor Bob Ker­rey, a mem­ber of the SEALs dur­ing the Viet­nam War, cau­tioned that Team 6 and other spe­cial op­er­a­tions forces had been overused. “They have be­come sort of a 1-800 num­ber any­time some­body wants some­thing done,” he said. But re­ly­ing on them so much, he added, is in­evitable when­ever US lead­ers are faced with “one of those sit­u­a­tions where the choice you have is be­tween a hor­ri­ble choice and a bad choice, one of those cases where you have no op­tion.”

While de­clin­ing to com­ment specif­i­cally on SEAL Team 6, the US Spe­cial Op­er­a­tions Com­mand said that since the Sep­tem­ber 11, 2001, at­tacks its forces “have been in­volved in tens of thou­sands of mis­sions and op­er­a­tions in mul­ti­ple ge­o­graphic the­atres, and con­sis­tently up­hold the high­est stan­dards re­quired of the US armed forces.”

The com­mand said its op­er­a­tors are trained to op­er­ate in com­plex and fast-mov­ing en­vi­ron­ments and it trusts them to con­duct them­selves ap­pro­pri­ately. “All al­le­ga­tions of mis­con­duct are taken se­ri­ously,” the state­ment said, adding: “Sub­stan­ti­ated find­ings are dealt with by mil­i­tary or law en­force­ment au­thor­i­ties.”

The unit’s ad­vo­cates ex­press no doubts about the value of such in­vis­i­ble war­riors. “If you want these forces to do things that oc­ca­sion­ally bend the rules of in­ter­na­tional law,” said James G Stavridis, a re­tired ad­mi­ral and for­mer supreme al­lied com­man­der at NATO, re­fer­ring to go­ing into un­de­clared war zones, “you cer­tainly don’t want that out in pub­lic.” Team 6, he added, “should con­tinue to op­er­ate in the shad­ows.”

But oth­ers warn of the se­duc­tion of an end­less cam­paign of se­cret mis­sions, far from pub­lic view. “If you’re un­ac­knowl­edged on the bat­tle­field,” said William C Banks, an ex­pert on na­tional se­cu­rity law at Syra­cuse Uni­ver­sity, “you’re not ac­count­able.”

Fight­ing up close

Dur­ing a chaotic bat­tle in March 2002 on the Takur Ghar moun­tain­top close to the Pak­istan bor­der, Petty Of­fi­cer 1st Class Neil C. Roberts, an as­sault spe­cial­ist in SEAL Team 6, fell from a he­li­copter onto ter­rain held by al-Qaida forces.

En­emy fight­ers killed him be­fore US troops were able to get there, mu­ti­lat­ing his body in the snow.

It was SEAL Team 6’s first ma­jor bat­tle in Afghanistan, and he was the first mem­ber to die. The man­ner in which he was killed sent shud­ders through the tight-knit com­mu­nity. Amer­i­ca’s new war would be up close and ugly. At times, the troops car­ried out the gris­li­est of tasks: cut­ting off fin­gers or small patches of scalp for DNA analy­sis from mil­i­tants they had just killed.

Af­ter the March 2002 cam­paign, most of Osama bin Laden’s fight­ers fled into Pak­istan, and Team 6 would rarely fight an­other sus­tained, pitched bat­tle against the ter­ror­ist net­work in Afghanistan. The en­emy they had been sent to take on had largely dis­ap­peared.

At the time, the team was pro­hib­ited from hunt­ing Tal­iban fight­ers and also blocked from chas­ing any al-Qaida op­er­a­tives into Pak­istan, out of con­cern about alien­at­ing the Pak­istani gov­ern­ment. Mostly con­fined to the Bagram Air Base out­side Kabul, the SEALs were frus­trated. The CIA, though, was un­der no sim­i­lar re­stric­tions, and Team 6 mem­bers even­tu­ally be­gan work­ing with the spy agency and op­er­ated un­der its broader com­bat au­thor­i­ties, ac­cord­ing to for­mer mil­i­tary and in­tel­li­gence of­fi­cials.

The mis­sions, part of the Omega Pro­gram, al­lowed the SEALs to con­duct “de­ni­able op­er­a­tions” against the Tal­iban and other mil­i­tants in Pak­istan. Omega was mod­elled af­ter the Viet­nam-era Phoenix Pro­gram, when CIA of­fi­cers and spe­cial op­er­a­tions troops con­ducted in­ter­ro­ga­tions and as­sas­si­na­tions to try to dis­man­tle the Vi­et­con­g’s guer­rilla net­works in South Viet­nam.

But an ex­ten­sive cam­paign of lethal op­er­a­tions in Pak­istan was con­sid­ered too risky, the of­fi­cials said, so the Omega Pro­gram pri­mar­ily fo­cused on us­ing Afghan Pash­tuns to run spy­ing mis­sions into the Pak­istani tribal ar­eas, as well as work­ing with CIA-trained Afghan mili­tias dur­ing night raids in Afghanistan. A CIA spokesman de­clined to com­ment for this ar­ti­cle.

The es­ca­lat­ing con­flict in Iraq was draw­ing most of the Pen­tagon’s at­ten­tion and re­quired a steady build-up of troops, in­clud­ing de­ploy­ments by SEAL Team 6 mem­bers. With the rel­a­tively small US mil­i­tary foot­print in Afghanistan, Tal­iban forces be­gan to re­group. Alarmed, Lt. Gen. Stan­ley A. Mc­Chrys­tal, who was lead­ing Joint Spe­cial Op­er­a­tions Com­mand, in 2006 or­dered the SEALs and other troops to take on a more ex­pan­sive task in Afghanistan: Beat back the Tal­iban.

That or­der led to years of nightly raids or fights by Team 6, which was des­ig­nated the lead spe­cial op­er­a­tions force dur­ing some of the most vi­o­lent years in what be­came Amer­i­ca’s longest war. A se­cret unit that was cre­ated to carry out the na­tion’s riski­est op­er­a­tions would in­stead be en­gaged in dan­ger­ous but in­creas­ingly rou­tine com­bat.

The surge in op­er­a­tions started dur­ing that sum­mer when Team 6 op­er­a­tors and army Rangers be­gan to hunt down mi­dlevel Tal­iban fig­ures in hopes of find­ing lead­ers of the group in Kan­da­har province, the Tal­iban heart­land. The SEALs used tech­niques de­vel­oped with Delta Force in kill-and-cap­ture cam­paigns in Iraq. The logic be­hind the man­hunts was that in­tel­li­gence gath­ered from a mil­i­tant safe house, along with that col­lected by the CIA and the Na­tional Se­cu­rity Agency, could lead to a bomb mak­er’s work­shop and even­tu­ally to the door of an in­sur­gent com­man­der.

Spe­cial op­er­a­tions troops struck a seem­ingly end­less suc­ces­sion of tar­gets. No fig­ures are pub­licly avail­able that break out the num­ber of raids Team 6 car­ried out in Afghanistan or their toll. Mil­i­tary of­fi­cials say no shots were fired on most raids. But be­tween 2006 and 2008, Team 6 op­er­a­tors said, there were in­tense pe­ri­ods in which for weeks at a time their unit logged 10 to 15 kills on many nights, and some­times up to 25.

The ac­cel­er­ated pace caused “guys to be­come fierce,” a for­mer Team 6 of­fi­cer said. “These killing fests had be­come rou­tine.”


A grave for re­mains of navy SEALs aboard a he­li­copter with the call sign Ex­tor­tion 17, shot down in 2011 in Afghanistan, at Ar­ling­ton Na­tional Ceme­tery in Ar­ling­ton, Vir­ginia, on March 22, 2015. The down­ing claimed 15 Gold Squadron mem­bers and two bomb spe­cial­ists — the most dev­as­tat­ing day in the his­tory of navy SEAL Team 6. (NYT photo by Gabriella Dem­czuk)

Spe­cial op­er­a­tions com­man­ders say the raids helped un­ravel Tal­iban net­works. But some Team 6 mem­bers came to doubt that they were mak­ing much of a dif­fer­ence. One for­mer se­nior en­listed SEAL mem­ber, pressed for de­tails about one mis­sion, said, “It be­came so many of these tar­gets, it was just an­other name.”
“Whether they were fa­cil­i­ta­tors, Tal­iban sub­com­man­ders, Tal­iban com­man­ders, fi­nanciers, it no longer be­came im­por­tant,” he added.

A for­mer Team 6 mem­ber, an of­fi­cer, was more dis­mis­sive of some of the op­er­a­tions. “By 2010, guys were go­ing af­ter street thugs,” he said. “The most highly trained force in the world, chas­ing af­ter street thugs.”

The unit pushed to make its op­er­a­tions faster, qui­eter and dead­lier, and ben­e­fited from a bal­loon­ing bud­get and from ad­vances in tech­nol­ogy since 2001. Team 6’s bland cover name — the Naval Spe­cial War­fare De­vel­op­ment Group — is a nod to its of­fi­cial mis­sion of de­vel­op­ing new equip­ment and tac­tics for the broader SEAL or­ga­ni­za­tion, which also in­cludes nine un­clas­si­fied teams.
The SEALs’ ar­mor­ers cus­tomized a new Ger­man-made ri­fle and equipped nearly every weapon with sup­pres­sors, which re­duce gun­shot sounds and muz­zle flashes. In­frared lasers en­abling the SEALs to shoot more ac­cu­rately at night be­came stan­dard is­sue, as did ther­mal op­tics to de­tect body heat. The SEALs were equipped with a new gen­er­a­tion of grenade — a ther­mo­baric model that is par­tic­u­larly ef­fec­tive in mak­ing build­ings col­lapse. They of­ten op­er­ated in larger groups than they had tra­di­tion­ally done. More SEALs car­ry­ing dead­lier weapons meant that fewer en­e­mies es­caped alive.

Some Team 6 as­sault troops also used tom­a­hawks crafted by Daniel Win­kler, a knife maker in North Car­olina who forged blades for the film “The Last of the Mo­hi­cans.” Dur­ing one pe­riod, mem­bers of Team 6’s Red Squadron — its logo shows crossed tom­a­hawks be­low the face of a Na­tive Amer­i­can war­rior — re­ceived a Win­kler hatchet af­ter their first year in the squadron, ac­cord­ing to two mem­bers. In an in­ter­view, Win­kler de­clined to dis­cuss which SEAL units had re­ceived his tom­a­hawks, but did say many were paid for by pri­vate donors.

The weapons were not just wall or­na­ments. Sev­eral for­mer Team 6 mem­bers said that some men car­ried the hatch­ets on mis­sions, and at least one killed an en­emy fighter with the weapon. Dom Raso, a for­mer Team 6 mem­ber who left the navy in 2012, said hatch­ets were used “for breach­ing, get­ting into doors, ma­nip­u­lat­ing small locks, hand-to-hand com­bat and other things.” He added that hatchet and blade kills oc­curred dur­ing his time with the SEALs.

“What­ever tool you need to pro­tect your­self and your broth­ers, whether it is a blade or a gun, you are go­ing to use,” said Raso, who has worked with Win­kler in pro­duc­ing a blade.

Many SEAL op­er­a­tors re­jected any use of tom­a­hawks — say­ing they were too bulky to take into com­bat and not as ef­fec­tive as firearms — even as they ac­knowl­edged the messi­ness of war­fare.

“It’s a dirty busi­ness,” said one for­mer se­nior en­listed Team 6 mem­ber. “What’s the dif­fer­ence be­tween shoot­ing them as I was told and pulling out a knife and stab­bing them or hatch­et­ing them?”

The cul­ture

SEAL Team 6’s fenced-off head­quar­ters at the Dam Neck An­nex of the Oceana Naval Air Sta­tion, just south of Vir­ginia Beach, Vir­ginia, houses a se­cre­tive mil­i­tary within the mil­i­tary. Far re­moved from the pub­lic eye, the base is home not just to the team’s 300 en­listed op­er­a­tors (they dis­dain the term “com­man­dos”), their of­fi­cers and com­man­ders, but also to its pi­lots, Seabee builders, bomb dis­posal tech­ni­cians, en­gi­neers, med­ical crews and an in­tel­li­gence unit equipped with so­phis­ti­cated sur­veil­lance and global track­ing tech­nol­ogy.

The navy SEALs — the acronym stands for Sea, Air, Land forces — evolved from the frog­men of World War II. Team 6 arose decades later, born out of the failed 1980 mis­sion to res­cue 53 US hostages seized in the takeover of the US Em­bassy in Tehran. Poor plan­ning and bad weather forced com­man­ders to abort the mis­sion, and eight ser­vice­men died when two air­craft col­lided over the Iran­ian desert.

The navy then asked Cmdr. Richard Marcinko, a hard-charg­ing Viet­nam vet­eran, to build a SEAL unit that could re­spond quickly to ter­ror­ist crises. The name it­self was an at­tempt at Cold War dis­in­for­ma­tion: Only two SEAL teams ex­isted at the time, but Marcinko called the unit SEAL Team 6 hop­ing that So­viet an­a­lysts would over­es­ti­mate the size of the force.

He flouted rules and fos­tered a mav­er­ick im­age for the unit. (Years af­ter leav­ing the com­mand, he was con­victed of mil­i­tary con­tract fraud.) In his au­to­bi­og­ra­phy, “Rogue War­rior,” Marcinko de­scribes drink­ing to­gether as im­por­tant to SEAL Team 6’s sol­i­dar­ity; his re­cruit­ing in­ter­views of­ten amounted to boozy chats in a bar.

In­side Team 6, there were ini­tially two as­sault groups, called Blue and Gold, af­ter the navy colours. Blue used the Jolly Roger pi­rate flag as its in­signia and early on earned the nick­name “the Bad Boys in Blue,” for rack­ing up drunken dri­ving ar­rests, abus­ing nar­cotics and crash­ing rental cars on train­ing ex­er­cises with near im­punity.

Young of­fi­cers some­times were run out of Team 6 for try­ing to clean up what they per­ceived as a cul­ture of reck­less­ness. Adm. William H. McRaven, who rose to head the Spe­cial Op­er­a­tions Com­mand and over­saw the bin Laden raid, was pushed out of Team 6 and as­signed to an­other SEAL team dur­ing the Marcinko era af­ter com­plain­ing of dif­fi­cul­ties in keep­ing his troops in line.

Ryan Zinke, a for­mer Team 6 of­fi­cer and now a Re­pub­li­can con­gress­man from Mon­tana, re­called an episode af­ter a team train­ing mis­sion aboard a cruise liner in prepa­ra­tion for po­ten­tial hostage res­cues at the 1992 Sum­mer Olympics in Barcelona, Spain. Zinke es­corted an ad­mi­ral to a bar in the ship’s lower level. “When we opened the door, it re­minded me of ‘Pi­rates of the Caribbean,'” Zinke said, re­call­ing that the ad­mi­ral was ap­palled by the op­er­a­tors’ long hair, beards and ear­rings. “My navy?” the ad­mi­ral asked him. “These guys are in my navy?”


Dr Dilip Joseph, who was res­cued by a group of a navy SEAL Team 6 op­er­a­tors in Afghanistan af­ter be­ing held hostage by Tal­iban mil­i­tants, in Col­orado Springs, Col­orado, on De­cem­ber 17, 2014. Joseph claims that one of his cap­tors had been safely sub­dued be­fore later be­ing fa­tally shot by SEALs, whose ac­tiv­i­ties have spurred re­cur­ring con­cerns about ex­ces­sive killings and civil­ian deaths. (NYT photo by Leslye Davis)

That was the be­gin­ning of what Zinke re­ferred to as “the great blood­let­ting,” when the navy purged Team 6’s lead­er­ship to pro­fes­sion­al­ize the force. Cur­rent and for­mer Team 6 op­er­a­tors said the cul­ture is dif­fer­ent to­day. Mem­bers now tend to be bet­ter ed­u­cated, more ath­letic, older and more ma­ture — though some are still known for push­ing lim­its.

“I got kicked out of the Boy Scouts,” one for­mer of­fi­cer said. Most Team 6 SEALs, he added, “were like me.”

Delta Force mem­bers, who have a rep­u­ta­tion for go­ing by the book, of­ten start out as reg­u­lar in­fantry, then move up through the army’s Ranger units and Spe­cial Forces teams be­fore join­ing Delta. But SEAL Team 6 is more iso­lated from the rest of the navy, with many of its men en­ter­ing the bru­tal SEAL train­ing pipeline from out­side the mil­i­tary.

Af­ter sev­eral years on reg­u­lar SEAL teams — the even-num­bered ones based in Vir­ginia Beach, the odd-num­bered ones in San Diego, and a unit in Hawaii ded­i­cated to min­isub­marines — SEALs can try out for Team 6. Many are ea­ger to get to the most elite unit, but about half of them wash out.

Of­fi­cers ro­tate through Team 6, some­times re­turn­ing for sev­eral tours, but the en­listed SEALs typ­i­cally stay far longer, giv­ing them out­size in­flu­ence. “A lot of the en­listed guys think that they re­ally run the show,” said one for­mer se­nior mem­ber. “That’s part of the Marcinko style.”

And they tend to swag­ger, crit­ics and de­fend­ers say. While the other SEAL teams (called “white” or “vanilla” SEALs within the mil­i­tary) per­form sim­i­lar tasks, Team 6 pur­sues the high­est value tar­gets and takes on hostage res­cues in com­bat zones. It also works more with the CIA and does more clan­des­tine mis­sions out­side war zones. Only Team 6 trains to chase af­ter nu­clear weapons that fall into the wrong hands.

Team 6’s role in the 2011 bin Laden raid spawned a cot­tage in­dus­try of books and doc­u­men­taries, leav­ing tight-lipped Delta Force troops rolling their eyes. Mem­bers of Team 6 are ex­pected to ho­n­our a code of si­lence about their mis­sions, and many cur­rent and for­mer mem­bers fume that two of their own spoke out about their role in the al-Qaida lead­er’s death. The men, Matt Bis­son­nette, au­thor of two best-sell­ers about his tenure at SEAL Team 6, and Robert O’Neill, who said in a tele­vi­sion spe­cial that he had killed bin Laden, are un­der in­ves­ti­ga­tion by the Naval Crim­i­nal In­ves­tiga­tive Ser­vice over ac­cu­sa­tions that they re­vealed clas­si­fied in­for­ma­tion.

Oth­ers have been qui­etly kicked out for drug use or quit over con­flicts of in­ter­est in­volv­ing mil­i­tary con­trac­tors or side jobs. The navy rep­ri­manded 11 cur­rent and for­mer op­er­a­tors in 2012 for dis­clos­ing Team 6 tac­tics or hand­ing over clas­si­fied train­ing films to help pro­mote a com­puter game, “Medal of Honor: Warfighter.”

With mul­ti­ple de­ploy­ments over the last 13 years, few of the unit’s mem­bers are un­scathed. About three dozen op­er­a­tors and sup­port per­son­nel have died on com­bat mis­sions, ac­cord­ing to a for­mer se­nior team mem­ber. They in­clude 15 Gold Squadron mem­bers and two bomb spe­cial­ists who were killed in 2011 when a he­li­copter with the call sign Ex­tor­tion 17 was shot down in Afghanistan, the most dev­as­tat­ing day in Team 6 his­tory.

Blasts from ex­plo­sions used to breach com­pounds on raids, re­peated as­saults and the bat­ter­ing from rid­ing on high-speed as­sault boats in sea res­cues or train­ing have taken a toll. Some men have suf­fered trau­matic brain in­juries. “Your body is trashed,” said one re­cently re­tired op­er­a­tor. “Your brain is trashed.”

“SEALs are a lot like NFL guys: They never want to say ‘I am tak­ing my­self out of the lineup,'” said Dr John Hart, med­ical sci­ence di­rec­tor at the Cen­ter for Brain­Health at the Uni­ver­sity of Texas at Dal­las, which has treated many SEAL pa­tients. “If they send guys back in who al­ready have the ef­fects of a con­cus­sion, they are con­stantly adding a dose of a hit to an ex­ist­ing brain con­di­tion. The brain needs suf­fi­cient time to heal.”

Lat­i­tude to kill

Early on in the Afghan war, SEAL Team 6 was as­signed to pro­tect the Afghan leader Hamid Karzai; one of the Amer­i­cans was grazed in the head dur­ing an as­sas­si­na­tion at­tempt on the fu­ture pres­i­dent. But in the years that fol­lowed, Karzai be­came a bit­ter critic of the US spe­cial op­er­a­tions troops, com­plain­ing that they rou­tinely killed civil­ians in raids. He viewed the ac­tiv­i­ties of Team 6 and other units as a boon for Tal­iban re­cruit­ing and even­tu­ally tried to block night raids en­tirely.

Most mis­sions were not lethal. Sev­eral Team 6 mem­bers said they herded women and chil­dren to­gether and knocked men out of the way, with a push or a gun muz­zle, to search homes. They fre­quently took pris­on­ers; a num­ber of de­tainees had bro­ken noses af­ter SEALs punched them in strug­gles to sub­due them, one of­fi­cer said.

The Team 6 mem­bers of­ten op­er­ate un­der the watch­ful eyes of their com­man­ders — of­fi­cers at over­seas op­er­a­tions cen­tres and at Dam Neck can rou­tinely view live sur­veil­lance feeds of raids pro­vided by drones high above — but are also given wide lat­i­tude. While spe­cial op­er­a­tions troops func­tioned un­der the same rules of en­gage­ment as other mil­i­tary per­son­nel in Afghanistan, Team 6 mem­bers rou­tinely per­formed their mis­sions at night, mak­ing life-or-death de­ci­sions in dark rooms with few wit­nesses and be­yond the view of a cam­era.

Op­er­a­tors would use weapons with sup­pres­sors to qui­etly kill en­e­mies as they slept, an act that they de­fend as no dif­fer­ent from drop­ping a bomb on an en­emy bar­racks. “I snuck into peo­ple’s houses while they were sleep­ing,” Bis­son­nette says in his book “No Hero,” writ­ten un­der the pseu­do­nym Mark Owen. “If I caught them with a gun, I killed them, just like all the guys in the com­mand.”

And their de­ci­sions tend to be cer­tain. Not­ing that they shoot to kill, a for­mer non-com­mis­sioned of­fi­cer added that the op­er­a­tors fire “se­cu­rity rounds” into those who are down to en­sure that they are dead. (In a 2011 mis­sion on a hi­jacked yacht off the coast of Africa, one Team 6 mem­ber slashed a pi­rate with a knife and left 91 wounds, ac­cord­ing to a med­ical ex­am­iner, af­ter the man and other at­tack­ers killed four US hostages. Op­er­a­tors are trained “to slice and dice every ma­jor artery,” one for­mer SEAL said.)

The rules boiled down to this, the non-com­mis­sioned of­fi­cer said: “If in your as­sess­ment you feel threat­ened, in a split sec­ond, then you’re go­ing to kill some­body.” He de­scribed how one SEAL sniper killed three un­armed peo­ple, in­clud­ing a small girl, in sep­a­rate episodes in Afghanistan and told his su­pe­ri­ors that he felt they had posed a threat. Legally, that was suf­fi­cient. “But that does­n’t fly” in Team 6, the non-com­mis­sioned of­fi­cer said. “You ac­tu­ally have to be threat­ened.” He added that the sniper was forced out of Team 6.

A half-dozen for­mer of­fi­cers and en­listed troops who were in­ter­viewed said they knew of civil­ian deaths caused by Team 6. Slabin­ski, a for­mer se­nior en­listed mem­ber of SEAL Team 6, said he wit­nessed Team 6 mem­bers mis­tak­enly kill civil­ians “prob­a­bly four or five times” dur­ing his de­ploy­ments.

Sev­eral for­mer of­fi­cers said they rou­tinely ques­tioned Team 6 op­er­a­tors when their sus­pi­cions were raised about un­war­ranted killings, but they usu­ally found no clear ev­i­dence of wrong­do­ing. “There was no in­cen­tive to dig deep on that,” said a for­mer se­nior spe­cial op­er­a­tions of­fi­cer.

“Do I think bad things went on?” an­other for­mer of­fi­cer asked. “Do I think there was more killing than should have been done? Sure.”

“I think the nat­ural in­cli­na­tion was, if it’s a threat, kill it, and later on you re­al­ize, ‘Oh, maybe I overassessed the threat,'” he said. “Do I think that guys in­ten­tion­ally killed peo­ple that did­n’t de­serve it? I have a hard time be­liev­ing that.”

Civil­ian deaths are an in­evitable part of every war but in con­flicts with no clear bat­tle lines and where en­emy fight­ers are of­ten in­dis­tin­guish­able from non-com­bat­ants, some mil­i­tary law ex­perts say, the tra­di­tional rules of war have be­come out­dated and new Geneva Con­ven­tion pro­to­cols are nec­es­sary. But oth­ers bris­tle at the no­tion, say­ing that the long-stand­ing, un­am­bigu­ous rules of be­hav­ior should gov­ern murky, mod­ern com­bat.

“Em­pha­siz­ing these lines and rules be­comes even more im­por­tant when you’re fight­ing a law­less, re­morse­less en­emy,” said Ge­of­frey S Corn, the for­mer se­nior law of war ex­pert for the army’s of­fice of the judge ad­vo­cate gen­eral and now a pro­fes­sor at South Texas Col­lege of Law. “That is when the in­stinct for re­venge is go­ing to be strong. And war is not about re­venge.”

Near the end of an Afghan de­ploy­ment by Team 6’s Blue Squadron, which con­cluded in early 2008, el­ders com­plained to the British gen­eral whose forces con­trolled Hel­mand province. He im­me­di­ately called Capt Scott Moore, com­man­der of SEAL Team 6, say­ing that two el­ders had re­ported that the SEALs killed civil­ians in a vil­lage, ac­cord­ing to a for­mer Team 6 se­nior mem­ber.


In a hand­out im­age pro­vided by the US navy, a lifeboat from the Maersk-Al­abama where Capt Richard Phillips was held hostage, in the In­dian Ocean on April 9, 2009. Navy SEALs trained con­stantly for res­cue mis­sions, dan­ger­ous and dif­fi­cult as­sign­ments they never had a chance to per­form be­fore 2001. (Via NYT)

Moore con­fronted those lead­ing the mis­sion, which was in­tended to cap­ture or kill a Tal­iban fig­ure code-named Ob­jec­tive Pan­tera.

When Moore asked what had hap­pened, the squadron com­man­der, Pe­ter G Vasely, de­nied that op­er­a­tors had killed any non-com­bat­ants. He said they had killed all the men they en­coun­tered be­cause they all had guns, ac­cord­ing to the for­mer Team 6 mem­ber and a mil­i­tary of­fi­cial. Vasely, who now over­sees the reg­u­lar SEAL teams based on the East Coast, de­clined to com­ment through a spokesman.

Moore asked the Joint Spe­cial Op­er­a­tions Com­mand to in­ves­ti­gate the episode. About that time, the com­mand re­ceived re­ports that dozens of wit­nesses in a vil­lage were al­leg­ing that US forces had en­gaged in sum­mary ex­e­cu­tions.

An­other for­mer se­nior Team 6 mem­ber con­tended later that Slabin­ski, Blue Squadron’s com­mand mas­ter chief, gave per­mis­sion guid­ance that every male at the tar­get be killed. Slabin­ski de­nied that, say­ing there was no pol­icy to leave all men dead. “I did­n’t ever con­vey that to the guys,” he said in an in­ter­view.

He said that around the time of that raid he had been dis­turbed af­ter wit­ness­ing one of the younger op­er­a­tors slash­ing at the throat of a dead Tal­iban fighter. “It ap­peared he was mu­ti­lat­ing a body,” Slabin­ski said, adding that he quickly yelled, “Stop what you’re do­ing!”

The Naval Crim­i­nal In­ves­tiga­tive Ser­vice later con­cluded the op­er­a­tor might have been cut­ting off gear from the dead fight­er’s chest. But Team 6 lead­ers said they were wor­ried that some op­er­a­tors were get­ting out of con­trol, and the one in­volved in the episode was sent back to the United States. Slabin­ski, sus­pect­ing that his men had not been fol­low­ing the rules of en­gage­ment prop­erly, gath­ered them for what he called a “very stern speech.”

“If any of you feel a need to do any ret­ri­bu­tion, you should call me,” he re­called telling them. “There’s no one that could au­tho­rize that other than me.” He said his mes­sage was in­tended to con­vey that per­mis­sion would never come be­cause such con­duct was in­ap­pro­pri­ate. But he con­ceded that per­haps some of his men may have mis­un­der­stood.

JSOC cleared the squadron of any wrong­do­ing in the Pan­tera op­er­a­tion, ac­cord­ing to two for­mer Team 6 mem­bers. It is not clear how many Afghans were killed in the raid or ex­actly where it hap­pened, though a for­mer of­fi­cer said he be­lieved it was just south of Lashkar Gah, the cap­i­tal of Hel­mand province.

But the killings prompted a high-level dis­cus­sion about how, in a coun­try where many men car­ried guns, Team 6 could “guar­an­tee that we’re only go­ing af­ter the real bad guys,” one of the for­mer se­nior team lead­ers said.

In other in­quiries, which were usu­ally han­dled by JSOC, not navy in­ves­ti­ga­tors, no one faced any charges. Typ­i­cally, men were sent home when con­cerns arose; three, for ex­am­ple, were sent back to Dam Neck af­ter rough­ing up a de­tainee dur­ing an in­ter­ro­ga­tion, one for­mer of­fi­cer said, as were some team mem­bers in­volved in ques­tion­able killings.

More than a year later, an­other mis­sion spurred strong protests from Afghans. Just af­ter mid­night on De­cem­ber 27, 2009, dozens of US and Afghan troops landed in he­li­copters sev­eral miles from the small vil­lage of Ghazi Khan in Ku­nar province, and hiked to the vil­lage in dark­ness. By the time they left, 10 res­i­dents had been killed, eight of them boys younger than 17.

What hap­pened that night is still in dis­pute. The pur­pose of the mis­sion was to cap­ture or kill a se­nior Tal­iban op­er­a­tive, but it was quickly ap­par­ent that no Tal­iban lead­ers were pre­sent at the tar­get. The mis­sion had been based on faulty in­tel­li­gence, a prob­lem that be­dev­iled US mil­i­tary op­er­a­tions even af­ter years in Afghanistan. A for­mer gov­er­nor of the province in­ves­ti­gated, and ac­cused the Amer­i­cans of killing un­armed school­boys.

The UN mis­sion in Afghanistan is­sued a state­ment say­ing that an ini­tial in­ves­ti­ga­tion had con­cluded that “eight of those killed were stu­dents en­rolled in lo­cal schools.”

US mil­i­tary spokes­men ini­tially said those who died were part of an in­sur­gent cell that had been build­ing im­pro­vised ex­plo­sive de­vices. Even­tu­ally, they backed off that claim. But some US mil­i­tary of­fi­cials still in­sist that all of the youths had guns and were tied to the Tal­iban. One Nato state­ment said the peo­ple who car­ried out the raid were “non-mil­i­tary in na­ture,” seem­ingly a ref­er­ence to the CIA, which was in charge of the op­er­a­tion.

But Team 6 mem­bers had also par­tic­i­pated in that mis­sion. As part of the covert Omega Pro­gram, they joined an as­sault force that in­cluded CIA para­mil­i­tary of­fi­cers and Afghan troops trained by the spy agency.

By then, the pro­gram that had be­gun at the dawn of the Afghan war had changed. For­ays into Pak­istan were lim­ited be­cause it was dif­fi­cult to op­er­ate there with­out be­ing no­ticed by Pak­istani sol­diers and spies, so mis­sions were mostly con­fined to the Afghan side of the bor­der.

Over time, Mc­Chrys­tal, who be­came the top US com­man­der in Afghanistan, re­sponded to Karza­i’s com­plaints about civil­ian deaths by tight­en­ing the rules on night raids and scal­ing back the pace of spe­cial op­er­a­tions.

Af­ter years of re­fin­ing tech­niques to sneak up on en­emy com­pounds, Team 6 mem­bers were of­ten re­quired to “call out” be­fore at­tack­ing a site, akin to a sher­iff an­nounc­ing through a bull­horn, “Come out with your hands up.”

Slabin­ski said civil­ian ca­su­al­ties oc­curred most of­ten dur­ing the “call out” op­er­a­tions, which were meant to mit­i­gate such losses. En­emy com­bat­ants, he said, would some­times send out fam­ily mem­bers and then shoot from be­hind them, or give civil­ians flash­lights and tell them to point out US po­si­tions.

O’Neill, the for­mer Team 6 mem­ber, agreed that the rules could be frus­trat­ing. “What we found was, the more lat­i­tude for col­lat­eral dam­age that they gave us, the more ef­fec­tive we were be­cause we’re not go­ing to take ad­van­tage of it but we know we’re not go­ing to be sec­ond-guessed,” he said in an in­ter­view. “When there were more rules, it did get more dif­fi­cult.”

Res­cue mis­sions

Years ago, be­fore the Afghan night raids and the wartime de­ploy­ments, SEAL Team 6 trained con­stantly to res­cue hostages — dan­ger­ous, dif­fi­cult mis­sions they never got a chance to per­form be­fore 2001. Since then, the unit has at­tempted at least 10 res­cues, which have been among its most cel­e­brated suc­cesses and bit­ter­est fail­ures.

Op­er­a­tors say that in res­cues — con­sid­ered “no-fail” mis­sions — they have to move faster and ex­pose them­selves to greater risk than on any other type of op­er­a­tion so that they can pro­tect hostages from be­ing shot or oth­er­wise harmed. The SEALs of­ten end up killing most of the cap­tors.

The first high-pro­file res­cue came in 2003, when SEAL Team 6 op­er­a­tors helped re­trieve Pfc Jes­sica Lynch, who had been in­jured, cap­tured and held in a hos­pi­tal, dur­ing the early days of the Iraq War.

Six years later, Team 6 mem­bers jumped out of cargo planes into the In­dian Ocean with their spe­cially de­signed as­sault boats in ad­vance of the mis­sion to res­cue Richard Phillips, cap­tain of the Maersk Al­abama, a con­tainer ship hi­jacked by So­mali pi­rates. The op­er­a­tors, cap­tured in a video shown by O’Neill, para­chuted with swim fins strapped over their boots af­ter re­leas­ing four boats — small, fast and equipped with stealth fea­tures to evade radar — that were each sus­pended by a canopy of mul­ti­ple para­chutes. SEAL snipers even­tu­ally killed three of the pi­rates.

In 2012, op­er­a­tors sky-dived into So­ma­lia to free a US aid worker, Jes­sica Buchanan, and her Dan­ish col­league, Poul Ha­gen Thisted. JSOC con­sid­ers its per­for­mance as the stan­dard for such mis­sions. The SEALs used a free-fall para­chut­ing tech­nique called “HAHO,” for high al­ti­tude-high open­ing, in which they jump from a high al­ti­tude and steer their way on the wind for many miles to cross a bor­der se­cretly, an ex­er­cise so risky that over the years sev­eral men died while in train­ing.

Buchanan re­called that four of the kid­nap­pers were within 15 feet of her when the Team 6 mem­bers ap­proached un­der cover of dark­ness. They shot and killed all nine cap­tors while res­cu­ing the aid work­ers. “Un­til they iden­ti­fied them­selves, I did not be­lieve a res­cue was pos­si­ble,” Buchanan said in an in­ter­view.

In Oc­to­ber 2010, one Team 6 mem­ber erred dur­ing an at­tempt to res­cue Linda Nor­grove, a 36-year old British aid worker be­ing held by the Tal­iban. Dis­as­ter struck in the first two min­utes, af­ter op­er­a­tors jumped from he­li­copters in the moun­tains of Ku­nar province and slid down 90 feet of braided rope to a steep slope, ac­cord­ing to two se­nior mil­i­tary of­fi­cials.


A Heck­ler & Koch MP7 firearm, top, fit­ted with a sup­pres­sor to re­duce muz­zle flashes and sounds, and an MP5, a sub­ma­chine gun widely used by law en­force­ment of­fi­cers, pho­tographed in Wash­ing­ton, on No­vem­ber 13, 2014. In the Amer­i­can mil­i­tary, the MP7 is used only by Delta Force and SEAL Team 6. Some po­lice SWAT teams have also bought it. (NYT photo by Doug Mills)

As they sprinted in the dark to­ward the Tal­iban com­pound, the newest mem­ber of the team was con­fused, he later told in­ves­ti­ga­tors. His gun had jammed. “Think­ing a mil­lion miles a minute,” he said, he threw a grenade at what he be­lieved were a pair of fight­ers hid­ing in a ditch.

But af­ter an ex­change of gun­fire that killed sev­eral Tal­iban cap­tors, the SEALs found the hostage — wear­ing dark cloth­ing and a head scarf — dead in the ditch. Ini­tially, the op­er­a­tor who threw the grenade and an­other unit mem­ber re­ported that Nor­grove was killed by an ex­plo­sive sui­cide vest. That story quickly fell apart. Sur­veil­lance video shows that she died al­most in­stantly from frag­men­ta­tion wounds to her head and back caused by the grenade blast, the in­ves­tiga­tive re­port noted.

A joint in­quiry by the US and British gov­ern­ments con­cluded that the op­er­a­tor who had thrown the grenade had vi­o­lated pro­ce­dures for hostage res­cues. He was forced out of Team 6, al­though per­mit­ted to re­main in an­other SEAL unit.

A res­cue op­er­a­tion two years later suc­ceeded in re­leas­ing a US physi­cian, though at great cost. One night in De­cem­ber 2012, a group of Team 6 op­er­a­tors wear­ing night-vi­sion gog­gles burst into a com­pound in Afghanistan where Tal­iban mil­i­tants were hold­ing Dr Dilip Joseph, who had been work­ing with an aid or­ga­ni­za­tion. The first op­er­a­tor to en­ter was felled by a shot to the head, and the other Amer­i­cans re­sponded with bru­tal ef­fi­ciency, killing all five of the cap­tors.

But Joseph and mil­i­tary of­fi­cials of­fer sharply dif­fer­ent ac­counts of how the raid un­folded. The physi­cian said in an in­ter­view that a 19-year-old named Wal­lakah was the sole kid­nap­per to sur­vive the ini­tial as­sault. He had been sub­dued by the SEAL op­er­a­tors and sat on the ground, hands around his knees, his head down, the doc­tor re­mem­bered. Wal­lakah, he be­lieved, was the one who had shot the Team 6 op­er­a­tor.

Min­utes later, while wait­ing to board a he­li­copter to free­dom, Joseph said, one of his SEAL res­cuers guided him back into the house, where he saw in the moon­light that Wal­lakah was ly­ing in a pool of blood, dead. “I re­mem­ber those things as clear as day,” the doc­tor said.

Mil­i­tary of­fi­cials, speak­ing only on back­ground about the clas­si­fied op­er­a­tion, con­tended that all of the cap­tors were quickly killed af­ter the SEAL team en­tered and Wal­lakah had never been taken pris­oner. They also said Joseph had seemed dis­ori­ented at the time and never re-en­tered the house, and ques­tioned whether he could have seen what was hap­pen­ing on the dark night.

Two years later, Joseph re­mains grate­ful for his res­cue and the sac­ri­fice made by Petty Of­fi­cer Nico­las D Checque, the team mem­ber killed on the mis­sion. But he still won­ders what hap­pened with Wal­lakah.

“It took me weeks to come to terms with the ef­fi­ciency of the res­cue,” Joseph said. “It was so sur­gi­cal.”

A global spy­ing force

From a string of fire­bases along the Afghan bor­der, Team 6 reg­u­larly sent Afghan lo­cals into the tribal ar­eas of Pak­istan to col­lect in­tel­li­gence. The team trans­formed the large, brightly painted “jin­gle” trucks pop­u­lar in the re­gion into mo­bile spy­ing sta­tions, hid­ing so­phis­ti­cated eaves­drop­ping equip­ment in the back of the trucks and us­ing Pash­tuns to drive them over the bor­der.

Out­side the moun­tains of Pak­istan, the team also ven­tured into the coun­try’s south­west desert, in­clud­ing the volatile Baluchis­tan re­gion. One mis­sion nearly ended in dis­as­ter when mil­i­tants fired a rocket-pro­pelled grenade from a door­way, caus­ing the roof of their com­pound to col­lapse and a Team 6 sniper atop it to fall through onto a small group of fight­ers. A fel­low US sniper nearby quickly killed them, one for­mer op­er­a­tor re­counted.

Be­yond Afghanistan and Pak­istan, mem­bers of Team 6’s Black Squadron were scat­tered around the world on spy­ing mis­sions. Orig­i­nally Team 6’s sniper unit, Black Squadron was re­con­fig­ured af­ter the Sept. 11 at­tacks to con­duct “ad­vance force op­er­a­tions,” mil­i­tary jar­gon for in­tel­li­gence gath­er­ing and other clan­des­tine ac­tiv­i­ties in prepa­ra­tion for a spe­cial op­er­a­tions mis­sion.

It was a par­tic­u­larly pop­u­lar con­cept at the Pen­ta­gon un­der for­mer de­fence sec­re­tary Don­ald H Rums­feld. By the mid­dle of last decade, Mc­Chrys­tal had des­ig­nated Team 6 to take on an ex­panded role in global in­tel­li­gence-gath­er­ing mis­sions, and Black Squadron op­er­a­tives de­ployed to US em­bassies from sub-Sa­ha­ran Africa to Latin Amer­ica to the Mid­dle East.

SEAL Team 6 used diplo­matic pouches, the reg­u­lar ship­ments of clas­si­fied doc­u­ments and other ma­te­r­ial to US diplo­matic posts, to get weapons to Black Squadron op­er­a­tors sta­tioned over­seas, said a for­mer mem­ber. In Afghanistan, Black Squadron op­er­a­tors wore tribal dress and sneaked into vil­lages to plant cam­eras and lis­ten­ing de­vices and in­ter­view res­i­dents in the days or weeks be­fore night raids, ac­cord­ing to sev­eral for­mer Team 6 mem­bers.


Al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden was killed by navy SEAL Team 6 in Pak­istan’s gar­ri­son town Ab­bot­tabad on May 2, 2011. 

The unit sets up front com­pa­nies to pro­vide cover for Black Squadron op­er­a­tors in the Mid­dle East, and runs float­ing spy­ing sta­tions dis­guised as com­mer­cial boats off the coasts of So­ma­lia and Yemen. Black Squadron mem­bers, work­ing from the US Em­bassy in Sanaa, the Yemeni cap­i­tal, were cen­tral to the hunt for An­war al-Awlaki, the rad­i­cal cleric and US cit­i­zen who had be­come af­fil­i­ated with al-Qaida in the Ara­bian Penin­sula. He was killed in 2011 by a CIA drone.

One for­mer mem­ber of Black Squadron said that in So­ma­lia and Yemen, op­er­a­tors were not al­lowed to pull the trig­ger un­less the high­est-value tar­gets were in their sights. “Out­side Iraq and Afghanistan we were not throw­ing any nets,” the for­mer mem­ber said. “It was to­tally dif­fer­ent.”

Black Squadron has some­thing the rest of SEAL Team 6 does not: fe­male op­er­a­tives. Women in the navy are ad­mit­ted to Black Squadron and sent over­seas to gather in­tel­li­gence, usu­ally work­ing in em­bassies with male coun­ter­parts. One for­mer SEAL Team 6 of­fi­cer said male and fe­male mem­bers of Black Squadron would of­ten work to­gether in pairs. It is called “pro­file soft­en­ing,” mak­ing the cou­ple ap­pear less sus­pi­cious to hos­tile in­tel­li­gence ser­vices or mil­i­tant groups.

Black Squadron now has more than 100 mem­bers, its growth co­in­cid­ing with the ex­pan­sion of per­ceived threats around the world. It also re­flects the shift among US pol­i­cy­mak­ers. Anx­ious about us­ing shadow war­riors in the years af­ter the 1993 “Black Hawk Down” de­ba­cle in Mo­gadishu, So­ma­lia, gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials to­day are will­ing to send units like SEAL Team 6 to con­flicts, whether the United States chooses to ac­knowl­edge its role or not.

“When I was in, we were al­ways chas­ing wars,” said Zinke, the con­gress­man and for­mer Team 6 mem­ber. “These guys found them.”

(Matthew Rosen­berg and Richard A Op­pel Jr con­tributed re­port­ing. Re­search was con­tributed by Kitty Ben­nett, Alain De­la­que­riere, Su­san Camp­bell Beachy and William M Arkin.)